Subject: Re: Hidden Files Not Being Copied
From: Duncan Sinclair (sinclair@dis.strath.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Jan 19 2001 - 12:39:42 EST
Hi,
Bob Rogers writes:
> From: Duncan Sinclair <sinclair@dis.strath.ac.uk>
> Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 14:55:38 +0000
>
> The fact is that dot files on Unix and hidden files on Mac exist
> is really for the same reason - to keep important-to-the-system,
> but un-important-to-the-user, files away from the user so that
> they can get on with their tasks without extra hassle.
>
>I would go further. Dot-files on Unix generally exist for Unix-specific
>purposes, and hidden files on the Mac exist for Mac-specific purposes,
>so it is pointless at best, and possibly counterproductive, to move them
>from Unix to Mac or vice versa. That is why I think netatalk's default
>behavior with respect to dot-files is optimal.
And how about files like ".htaccess"?
If you're developing a web site on your Mac for delivery on Apache
running on Unix, you've got every right and reason to be wanting
to edit dot files.
Cheers,
Duncan.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Oct 14 2001 - 03:04:31 EDT