Re: Netatalk ok, reliable for large no of users?

Subject: Re: Netatalk ok, reliable for large no of users?
From: Rory Campbell-Lange (rory@campbell-lange.net)
Date: Wed Feb 21 2001 - 04:53:37 EST

Hi Ryan

Thanks for your valuable comment. I suppose my main concern presently has
to do with AoIP versus plain Appletalk. If netatalk gives us the ability to
do AoIP (which NT4 doesn't) and this has some significant speed increases,
we'd be pretty interested.

How many people use the netatalk serving in your environment?

Cheers;
Rory

On 20/2/01, ryan@mobiusnm.com (Ryan McBeth) wrote:

> I hate to put on a flame-proof suit, but I might stay with NT
> in your situation. As a web publishing house, we need the
> virtual-hosting capabilities of Linux and Apache. Netatalk allows
> our artists to archive and publish right to the Apache server, things
> that we can't really do with IIS/NT. However, if NT is working for
> you now, maybe you should stick with it.
> You'll never find a more pro-linux person than me, but if NT is
> working, and working well in your situation, it might be better to
> get a second NT machine, network mount the drive through the first
> machine, and keep on working. 

--
	Rory Campbell-Lange
	The Campbell-Lange Workshop
	London

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Oct 14 2001 - 03:04:33 EDT