Subject: Re: Another reason to go GPL
From: wes@umich.edu
Date: Tue Mar 27 2001 - 16:24:23 EST
It's no problem to release netatalk under a GPL license, so long as all of
the previous licenses are kept. Presuming GPL will allow that, you should
do as it suits the current developers.
BTW, the volunteer from the sourceforge netatalk team on netatalk@umich.edu
is now bouncing mail. Someone from that group should read
netatalk@umich.edu
since questions about 1.5 go there.
:wes
--On Tuesday, March 27, 2001 9:55 AM -0800 andrew morgan <morgan@orst.edu>
wrote:
>
> Here's another reason we should go GPL with netatalk. Samba has a piece
> of code which does quotas on Veritas File Systems which I need to use at
> our site. Same problem as the file locking code though. We can't take
> GPL code and place it in netatalk without releasing netatalk as GPL.
>
> I may be able to get permission from the author of that particular piece
> of code to include it in netatalk anyways, but the samba project itself
> will not release the code for our use.
>
> GPL - just do it. :P
>
> Andy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Oct 14 2001 - 03:04:35 EDT