Re: Aliases: Are alternate filesystems worth trying?

Subject: Re: Aliases: Are alternate filesystems worth trying?
From: jeff (jeff@univrel.pr.uconn.edu)
Date: Thu Jun 07 2001 - 09:31:18 EDT

• Next message: Rich Lafferty: "Re: User authentication"
• Previous message: jeff: "Re: User authentication"
• In reply to: Richard Goldman: "Re: Aliases: Are alternate filesystems worth trying?"
• Next in thread: Andrew D. Myers: "Netatalk --> Win2K SfM?"
• Reply: jeff: "Re: Aliases: Are alternate filesystems worth trying?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Richard Goldman wrote:
-- SNIP --
> It also appears, at least as of the CVS from the
> morning of June 6 (PDT), the new mtab stuff isn't
> having an impact on the encoding.

Are you compiling with --with-did=mtab? It only affects one line in
etc/afpd/enumerate.c, if I'm not mistaken.

Thanks,
Jeff

• Next message: Rich Lafferty: "Re: User authentication"
• Previous message: jeff: "Re: User authentication"
• In reply to: Richard Goldman: "Re: Aliases: Are alternate filesystems worth trying?"
• Next in thread: Andrew D. Myers: "Netatalk --> Win2K SfM?"
• Reply: jeff: "Re: Aliases: Are alternate filesystems worth trying?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Oct 14 2001 - 03:04:41 EDT