Subject: Re: natalk and Mac OS X
From: Lorenzo Perone (lopez.on.the.lists@yellowspace.net)
Date: Sat Jul 07 2001 - 21:54:10 EDT
At 23:36 Uhr +0200 07.07.2001, Carsten Neumann wrote:
>On Sat, 07 Jul 2001, Steven Karel wrote:
>> Lorenzo Perone wrote:
>> 2.14pre37 works fine with kernel 2.4.x (compiled on background of Redhat 7.0).
>>
>> 2.14pre37 does have some problems with OS X, especially if you copy large numbers of files (1000+) from a server, or on copying smaller number of files to a server. It's far from bulletproof.
>>
>> The sourceforge 1.5pre7 CVS version does seem to work at least as well as 2.1.4pre37, IF you compile it with:
>
>Hey, what did I miss?
>
>Is/was/will this message falling out of the future?
>The latest netatalk version I know is 1.5pre6.
>Never heard of "2.14.x" or "2.1.4.x"!
there are in fact two netatalk packages (which shouldn't be mixed normally):
- one based on netatalk 1.4b2 and mantained by Adrian Sun (the '+asun2.1.x' versions)
(_usually_ defaults to /usr/local/atalk - comes with most linux distribs)
- one which is the 'official' new 1.5 release, mantained by the people at SourceForge.
(_usually_ spreads itself into /etc/atalk, /usr/sbin, /usr/bin and other dirs)
>It seems we are talking about two completely different things!
in fact.... :-)
but configuration files have been compatible, up to yet, among the two.
Lorenzo
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Oct 14 2001 - 03:04:44 EDT