Re: okay, so what version should I use with 10.1?

Subject: Re: okay, so what version should I use with 10.1?
From: Chris Garrigues (cwg-dated-496d6ebc8f53ae09@deepeddy.com)
Date: Thu Oct 11 2001 - 18:33:08 EDT

> From: "Chad Leigh -- ObjectWerks Inc." <chad@objectwerks.com>
> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 18:21:09 -0400
>
> The reason you want to use netatlk and not samba or nfs is that netatalk
> talks the apple language of 2-forked files and apple file meta data.
> NFS and samba don't. atalk over tcp is very fast and works well. And
> netatlk seems to be ok.
>
> Chad
>
> On Thursday, October 11, 2001, at 06:12 PM, mikko@fs.sorl.net wrote:
>
> > I never used osX but i can tell you that I would use
> > samba or NFS over netatalk anyday.

Also, I'd question the sanity of anyone who prefered NFS over pretty much
anything else, except probably abominations like netbios. They don't call
it the Nightmare File System for nothing.

Chris 

-- 
Chris Garrigues                 http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
virCIO                          http://www.virCIO.Com
4314 Avenue C                   
Austin, TX  78751-3709		+1 512 374 0500

  My email address is an experiment in SPAM elimination.  For an
  explanation of what we're doing, see http://www.DeepEddy.Com/tms.html 

    The Greatest tragedy in mankind's entire history may be the
      hijacking of morality by religion.  However valuable -- even
      necessary -- that may have been in enforcing good behavior on
      primitive peoples, their association is now counterproductive.
      Yet at the very moment when they should be decoupled,
      sanctimonious nitwits are calling for a return to morals based
      on superstition.
				--- Arthur C. Clarke

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Oct 14 2001 - 03:04:55 EDT