Subject: Re: okay, so what version should I use with 10.1?
From: David (zer0@mac.com)
Date: Fri Oct 12 2001 - 10:47:02 EDT
I second that, being frustrated. Appleshare just seems to be the best file
sharing system overall. Samba is great as well, but it seems that
Appleshare has better password encrytion available. It is certainly better
than NFS or SMB on MacOS(X or 9), both of which did not do well in OSX 10.
0.x or 10.1.
I get a kick out of the fact that Netatalk seems to be twice or more as
fast as Apple's Appleshare on OSX. :)
Just my $0.07.
David Shaub
On Friday, October 12, 2001, at 08:09 AM, Chip Mefford wrote:
> On 2001.10.11 17:54 Chris Garrigues wrote:
>>> From: mikko@fs.sorl.net
>>> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 23:20:49 +0200
>>>
>>> If you use osX, why dont you use samba?
>>
>
> I tried this, and just got extremely frustrated,
> as has been my experience with 10.x
>
>
> Under the users/username/Documents directory, I make
> a "test" directory,
>
> ran mount,
>
> mount -t smbfs //sambaserver/sharename
> /"path"/username/Documents/test
>
> and logged in just fine.
>
> Then I drilled to the test director with the finder, but
> each time I tried to open any document, or use anything
> on the mounted directory, I get prompted for a
> login, so I log in, and then I get a shortcut/alias on
> the desktop to the file, click on that, get prompted to
> log in, I log in, get a shortcut/alias and so on and so
> on.
>
> What would be the correct way to do this?
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Oct 14 2001 - 03:04:55 EDT