Subject: Re: Does the PAM stuff work in 1.5pre8?
From: Chris Garrigues (cwg-dated-44b698b7f1336285@deepeddy.com)
Date: Sat Oct 13 2001 - 15:14:38 EDT
> From: Sebastian Rittau <srittau@jroger.in-berlin.de>
> Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 04:19:27 +0200
>
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 02:39:58PM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote:
>
> > configure.in sez:
> >
> > AM_CONDITIONAL(BUILD_PAM, test x$compile_pam = xyes)
> >
> > but $compile_pam is never defined...anywhere.
>
> This was fixed in CVS.
Good. Doesn't do me any good right down, but I'll be looking forward to
1.5pre9 so I can remove the kludge I just put in my spec file.
Chris
-- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ virCIO http://www.virCIO.Com 4314 Avenue C Austin, TX 78751-3709 +1 512 374 0500My email address is an experiment in SPAM elimination. For an explanation of what we're doing, see http://www.DeepEddy.Com/tms.html
The Greatest tragedy in mankind's entire history may be the hijacking of morality by religion. However valuable -- even necessary -- that may have been in enforcing good behavior on primitive peoples, their association is now counterproductive. Yet at the very moment when they should be decoupled, sanctimonious nitwits are calling for a return to morals based on superstition. --- Arthur C. Clarke
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Oct 14 2001 - 03:04:55 EDT