Subject: Re: Pre5 and RH 7
From: g.roest@linvision.com
Date: Thu Mar 08 2001 - 17:02:07 EST
Hi,
I too experienced this line with RH7 (2.4.2) and Pre4:
In my Appleshare.system I have the line:
/home/data "Data schijf"
In my apfd.conf I have the line:
"Data schijf" -transall -uamlist uams_guest.so,uams_clrtxt.so,uams_dhx.so
-loginmesg "Welkom op de ZoW Data schijf."
When I didn't have the "uams_clrtxt.so,uams_dhx.so" in the apfd.conf I got
messages like:
Mar 8 10:50:08 dakota afpd[10473]: session from 65280.128:245 on
65280.148:131
Mar 8 10:50:08 dakota afpd[10473]: cleartext login: gerard
Mar 8 10:50:08 dakota PAM_pwdb[10473]: (netatalk) session opened for user
gerard by (uid=0)
Mar 8 10:50:08 dakota afpd[10473]: login gerard (uid 503, gid 100)
Mar 8 10:51:06 dakota afpd[10473]: setdirowner: chown 16777216/-1
.AppleDouble/.Parent: Operation not permitted
Mar 8 10:51:06 dakota afpd[10473]: setdirowner: chown 16777216/-1
.AppleDouble: Operation not permitted
Mar 8 10:51:06 dakota afpd[10473]: setdirowner: chown 16777216/-1 .:
Operation not permitted
Mar 8 10:51:06 dakota afpd[10473]: setdirowner: chown -1/0
.AppleDouble/.Parent: Operation not permitted
Mar 8 10:51:06 dakota afpd[10473]: setdirowner: chown 16777216/-1
.AppleDouble/.Parent: Operation not permitted
Mar 8 10:51:06 dakota afpd[10473]: setdirowner: chown 16777216/-1
.AppleDouble: Operation not permitted
Mar 8 10:51:06 dakota afpd[10473]: setdirowner: chown 16777216/-1 .:
Operation not permitted
Mar 8 10:51:06 dakota afpd[10473]: setdirowner: chown -1/0
.AppleDouble/.Parent: Operation not permitted
Mar 8 10:55:00 dakota CROND[10477]: (root) CMD (/etc/ppp/ipadresupload)
Mar 8 10:58:29 dakota PAM_pwdb[10473]: (netatalk) session closed for user
gerard
Mar 8 10:58:29 dakota afpd[10473]: 2.78KB read, 5.18KB written
Mar 8 10:58:29 dakota afpd[10473]: done
Mar 8 10:58:29 dakota afpd[10429]: server_child[0] 10473 done
I'm not sure, (I'm just a starting netatalk user) but does this not look
like gerard could login? Anyway, after logging in he tried to put a file in
the share, and then the messages of "Operation not permitted" came. After I
put the "uams_clrtxt.so,uams_dhx.so" in the apfd.conf and 'pwunconv"-ing
the passwd file I only got messages like:
Mar 8 14:18:18 dakota afpd[12249]: session from 65280.128:245 on
65280.148:131
Mar 8 14:18:18 dakota afpd[12249]: cleartext login: gerard
Mar 8 14:18:18 dakota PAM_pwdb[12249]: (netatalk) session opened for user
gerard by (uid=0)
Mar 8 14:18:18 dakota afpd[12249]: login gerard (uid 503, gid 100)
Mar 8 14:18:49 dakota PAM_pwdb[12249]: (netatalk) session closed for user
gerard
Mar 8 14:18:49 dakota afpd[12249]: 2.36KB read, 5.18KB written
Mar 8 14:18:49 dakota afpd[12249]: done
Mar 8 14:18:49 dakota afpd[10429]: server_child[0] 12249 done
During this log he tried to put a file in the share, but the end result was
the same: it was not possible to do so. The file appeared to be there but
its size was 0, just like previous example.
greetings,
Gerben Roest.
--- Linvision BV tel: 015-7502310 Elektronicaweg 16 d fax: 015-7502319 2628 XG Delft g.roest@linvision.com The Netherlands www.linvision.com"Daniel E. Lautenschleger" To: Netatalk Mailing List <netatalk-admins@umich.edu> <dan@www.molbio cc: .wisc.edu> Subject: Pre5 and RH 7 08-03-2001 22:27
I just installed the RPM Pre5 on my RH 7 box and specifying only DHX in the netatalk.conf file does not allow me to copy files properly. It claims there is a permission problem. I believe this bug was present in Pre 4 as well.
Logs:
Mar 8 15:24:17 itchy afpd[2591]: ASIP session:548(1) from 144.92.19.76:49272(2) Mar 8 15:24:17 itchy afpd[2591]: dhx login: usrdel Mar 8 15:24:17 itchy afpd[2591]: uams_dhx_pam.c :PAM: PAM Success -- Function not implemented Mar 8 15:24:17 itchy PAM_pwdb[2591]: (netatalk) session opened for user usrdel by (uid=0) Mar 8 15:24:17 itchy afpd[2591]: uams_dhx_pam.c :PAM: PAM Auth OK!: (null) -- Inappropriate ioctl for device Mar 8 15:24:17 itchy afpd[2591]: login usrdel (uid 500, gid 500) Mar 8 15:24:19 itchy afpd[2591]: setdirowner: chown -1/0 .AppleDouble/.Parent: Operation not permitted
What's line 5 all about!? ioctl...
Anyone else experiencing this?
-Dan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Oct 14 2001 - 03:04:34 EDT