Re: okay, so what version should I use with 10.1?


Subject: Re: okay, so what version should I use with 10.1?
From: Chad Leigh -- ObjectWerks Inc. (chad@objectwerks.com)
Date: Thu Oct 11 2001 - 18:21:09 EDT


The reason you want to use netatlk and not samba or nfs is that netatalk
talks the apple language of 2-forked files and apple file meta data.
NFS and samba don't. atalk over tcp is very fast and works well. And
netatlk seems to be ok.

Chad

On Thursday, October 11, 2001, at 06:12 PM, mikko@fs.sorl.net wrote:

> I never used osX but i can tell you that I would use
> samba or NFS over netatalk anyday.
>
> All the best /Mikko
>
>
> At 23:54 2001-10-11, you wrote:
>> > From: mikko@fs.sorl.net
>> > Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 23:20:49 +0200
>> >
>> > If you use osX, why dont you use samba?
>>
>> Well...
>>
>> 1) I've always used atalk in the past.
>>
>> 2) It hadn't occured to me.
>>
>> 3) I can't figure out how. Searching for smb tells me "Choose Connect
>> To
>> Server from the Finder's Go menu, then browse for the server or enter
>> its
>> address. All I see is the appletalk server, not the SMB server. How
>> do I
>> tell it to use SMB?
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> --
>> Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
>> virCIO http://www.virCIO.Com
>> 4314 Avenue C
>> Austin, TX 78751-3709 +1 512 374 0500
>>
>> My email address is an experiment in SPAM elimination. For an
>> explanation of what we're doing, see http://www.DeepEddy.Com/tms.html
>>
>> The Greatest tragedy in mankind's entire history may be the
>> hijacking of morality by religion. However valuable -- even
>> necessary -- that may have been in enforcing good behavior on
>> primitive peoples, their association is now counterproductive.
>> Yet at the very moment when they should be decoupled,
>> sanctimonious nitwits are calling for a return to morals based
>> on superstition.
>> --- Arthur C. Clarke
>>
>>
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Oct 14 2001 - 03:04:55 EDT