Re: [Netatalk-devel] Re: .AppleDouble tests on OpenBSD (long...)


Subject: Re: [Netatalk-devel] Re: .AppleDouble tests on OpenBSD (long...)
From: andrew morgan (morgan@orst.edu)
Date: Wed Apr 25 2001 - 12:07:01 EDT


On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Karen A Swanberg wrote:

> So to clarify for the newbies, this breaks down to "This isn't a
> problem?" We just need to tell our sysloggers to ignore it? Are the errors
> catagorized as something like afpd.error or something similar that we can
> configure our syslogs to ignore? I don't want to miss other errors, or
> have my console window so full of this information that I miss others. If
> and when the change is made in the CVS, will someone post here, so I can
> test that new version?
>
> Great to hear that this isn't a problem. I've been drooling to let my
> users at this fileserver for awhile, and this was the last stumbling
> block. Don't worry, I'll tell them it's still in testing.

I've made the change in CVS since nobody squawked about it. Give it a
whirl.

        Andy



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Oct 14 2001 - 03:04:38 EDT