Re: Mac OS X and netatalk...


Subject: Re: Mac OS X and netatalk...
From: Scott Every (scott@emji.net)
Date: Tue Mar 27 2001 - 16:47:10 EST


right, think 1.0 release of a new os. it WILL get fixed. they had to get
this out so developers would stop dragging their feet. of course its not
perfect. wait until the first update.

s

--On Tuesday, March 27, 2001 10:31 PM +0200 Jason Quigley <jasonq@mac.com>
wrote:

> Everybody is talking about Classic here. Granted, that's faster, but
> things like re-sizing windows and using the finder are just as slow, even
> if they do look prettier.
>
> Cheers,
> Jason.
>
>
> On Tuesday, March 27, 2001, at 10:13 pm, Chad Cunningham wrote:
>
>>
>> I agree, I've got the final release on an iBook G3 300 and it works
>> great.
>> The slowness associated with PB is gone, doesn't get hung up switching
>> active windows, etc. Apps are still a bit slow to launch, but waking up
>> from sleep is much much faster. Speed on classic apps is excellent, much
>> much better than PB.
>>
>> Really, I think it will run fine on any G3 with sufficient ram (at least
>> 128 if you want to use classic).
>>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Oct 14 2001 - 03:04:35 EDT